| You are in: Sci/Tech | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wednesday, 28 March, 2001, 16:07 GMT 17:07 UK Nuclear waste: A long-lived legacy ![]() Part of BNFL's Sellafield waste encapsulation plant (Photo: BNFL) By BBC News Online's environment correspondent Alex Kirby One reason why nuclear waste worries a lot of people is because it can be dangerous. Just as important, some forms need guarding for many thousands of years before they decay to a safe level. That is a sobering legacy to bequeath to generations far into the future. And the nuclear industry's critics say a safe way of disposing of the waste is not even on the horizon. Most of the waste comes from relatively few countries. The biggest producer, in terms of electricity generated, is the US, followed by France (75% of whose electricity comes from nuclear power), Japan, Russia, Germany and the UK. Surface storage But France and the UK, because they reprocess spent nuclear fuel, are huge waste generators. There are different sorts of waste. British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL) offers some definitions:
Nirex, the company charged with finding a suitable repository site, was ordered by the UK Government in 1997 to stop investigating rock formations beneath Sellafield, which it had hoped could house the waste. The Sellafield geology was reported to be unsuitable for safe long-term disposal, and the search continues. High-level waste is vitrified (made into blocks of glass). Because it gives off so much heat, it has to be continuously cooled. Some of its constituent isotopes decay fairly quickly, in decades or centuries, to the point where they can be reclassified as intermediate-level waste. But plutonium itself has a half-life of 24,000 years (the time it takes to lose half its radioactivity), and other isotopes take millions of years to reach the same point. Dr Helen Wallace, of Greenpeace, told BBC News Online: "There are no facilities for disposing of high-level waste. All you can do is vitrify it and hope for the best. Long search "There is considerable evidence that if you put it underground it would eventually leak into the groundwater. The science is very poorly understood. "Waste disposal is one of the major question marks over the nuclear industry. In the UK there simply is no policy. "They've been looking for a solution for decades, and they'll be looking for decades yet. "And while that's true of the UK, it's also true worldwide."
Its critics say the policy is dangerously short-sighted: they claim that geological changes could mean the repository rises above the seabed within a few centuries. Optimism And the nuclear industry itself remains hopeful. The Uranium Institute, a London-based worldwide network of people working in the production of nuclear-generated electricity, thinks the waste problem is soluble. It says: "Many milestones have been accomplished with the establishment of research facilities for HLW repositories in Belgium, France, Germany, Canada, Sweden and Switzerland . . . The disposal of HLW is surmountable." |
See also: Internet links: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top Sci/Tech stories now: Links to more Sci/Tech stories are at the foot of the page. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more Sci/Tech stories |
| ^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII|News Sources|Privacy | ||