| You are in: World | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tuesday, 29 August, 2000, 13:39 GMT 14:39 UK Russia's nuclear submarines 'could sink' ![]() There are more than a hundred decommissioned submarines in northern Russia By environment correspondent Alex Kirby in Oslo The Bellona Foundation, an independent Norwegian research group, says the evidence is strong that the Russian submarine Kursk was destroyed by an explosion. Bellona says the blast occurred either in one of the Kursk's torpedoes, or in a torpedo fuel tank. It dismisses persistent Russian claims that a foreign submarine collided with the Kursk. And it says there is acute concern over 30 other abandoned submarines in the same area. Thomas Nilsen, a Bellona researcher, told BBC News Online during an interview in the group's Oslo headquarters: "The Kursk's torpedoes used to be battery-powered, but in 1998 they were converted to liquid fuel. No sabotage "The change was made to save money, but the vessel's crew protested strongly, because of the risk. "Both the torpedoes and the fuel are made by a firm called DagDizel, which is based in Dagestan in southern Russia. There have been suggestions that the disaster was an act of sabotage linked to the war in Chechnya, but that's absurd.
The Russian military daily Red Star reported a former Northern fleet admiral as saying that industry representatives had tried to foist the new-style torpedoes on the navy, which said they were difficult to store and dangerous to handle. Mr Nilsen said he thought the Russians would try to salvage the vessel, in order to retrieve the bodies of the crew, although they would again need Western assistance. "The failed rescue attempt was the first time that Russia has ever accepted help from the West in a naval accident", he said. "I think what happened will lead to changes in the Russian navy, which is facing unprecedented public criticism." Mr Nilsen said the submarine's reactor compartment was filled with seawater, so there might ultimately be small leaks of radioactivity. But he was far more worried at the condition of about 30 submarines from the Northern fleet now abandoned in the waters around the Kola peninsula, close to the Norwegian frontier. The fleet has decommissioned 110 submarines, 72 of them with their nuclear fuel still on board. The vessels that worry Mr Nilsen still have their fuel. Cut apart Some have been tied up for 15 years, and they are so corroded they are no longer remotely seaworthy. "Under the Start disarmament agreements with the US they had their missile sections removed", Mr Nilsen explained.
"If they do, it will be possible for seawater to get into the reactors, and the worst possible consequence of that would be a meltdown. "The boats are in naval bases all along the Kola coast, and two of them are lying in Murmansk, a city of 430,000 people." Slow progress Bellona's Russian office is in Murmansk. Privately, many Western experts are deeply worried at the potential for catastrophic contamination in northern Russia. They say the problems are not technical, but political - the creaking pace of Russian officialdom, and the ingrained instinct to secrecy. But Bellona refuses to despair. "Perhaps the biggest fear is fear itself", says Thomas Nilsen. "Progress is very slow. But it's happening. And as long as it is, that's good." All photographs courtesy of Bellona Foundation |
See also: Internet links: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top World stories now: Links to more World stories are at the foot of the page. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more World stories |
| ^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII|News Sources|Privacy | ||