![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sunday, April 18, 1999 Published at 23:55 GMT 00:55 UKHealth Quality of elderly care under fire ![]() The quality of care for the elderly is in question Older patients could be getting the wrong medicines, doctors have warned.
The move comes as Age Concern publishes a survey revealing that one in 20 people over 65 has been refused treatment by the NHS.
The survey also found that almost two million people have noticed different treatment from the NHS since they turned 50. Prescribing concerns The study of prescribing habits towards older people is being carried out by the Royal College of Physicians (RCP). Medication for Older People, a 1997 report from the college, said older people were more likely to suffer from:
The study will be repeated next year, and then both sets of data will be compared with evidence to see if doctors are prescribing in accordance with best practice. The results will be used to encourage local improvements, the college says. Complex process Professor Stephen Jackson is leading the audit. He said: "Prescribing is becoming increasingly more complex.
"We intend to enable both prescribers and older patients to benefit." However, the study launches on the same day that Age Concern attacks the quality of NHS care for older patients. In its survey, conducted by Gallup, Age Concern asked 1,597 adults over the age of 50 about their experiences with the health service. They found that, of all health professionals, the respondents most commonly experienced problems with doctors. The charity said: "Worryingly, many people cited GPs, the 'gatekeepers' of the NHS, as the main cause of their problems." Criticisms of the NHS Some comments Age Concern gathered included:
She said: "The 'don't care - won't care' attitude experienced by so many older people causes huge emotional and physical pain for the person on the receiving end. "All older people should be entitled to the good quality healthcare which is currently enjoyed by the lucky few. The government should step up its action to improve standards nationwide. An audit of discriminatory practices is the first step towards achieving this. "Older people and their families who want to speak out about unequal treatment should join our campaign; we will not be 'fobbed off' any longer." Clinical reasons for restrictions The British Medical Association said that rationing by age was unacceptable, but added that there was no evidence to suggest this was happening. Dr Ian Bogle, the association's chairman, said: "This report raises very real worries in my mind because, generally speaking it is not a picture of the health service I would recognise." He acknowledged that sometimes staff could be brusque, but said that on the whole they treated older people with respect. He also said that sometimes the most clinically appropriate course of action would mean an older person being denied a treatment a younger person was given. This was nothing to do with cost, he said. "People should receive clinically appropriate treatment, whatever their age," Dr Bogle said. "It will not always be the same treatment or referral. Cancers, for example, progress much more rapidly in younger patients than in older patients. "So a woman in her thirties with breast cancer may need aggressive radiotherapy and chemotherapy while a woman in her seventies might receive drug treatment and be spared the risks of surgery." | Health Contents
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||