EuropeSouth AsiaAsia PacificAmericasMiddle EastAfricaBBC HomepageWorld ServiceEducation
News image
News image
News image
News imageNews image
News image
Front Page
News image
World
News image
UK
News image
UK Politics
News image
Business
News image
Sci/Tech
News image
Health
News image
Education
News image
Sport
News image
Entertainment
News image
Talking Point
News image
News image
News image
On Air
Feedback
Low Graphics
Help
News imageNews imageNews image
News imageThursday, August 6, 1998 Published at 23:59 GMT 00:59 UK
News image
News image
Health
News image
Better breast cancer screening 'could save lives'
News image
Extending breast screening would cost the NHS, but would save lives
News image
Extending routine breast screening to women over 65 or reducing the gap between screenings could bring down the number of deaths from cancer by up to 5%, according to a new study.

In 1988, the NHS began routine three yearly tests on women aged 50 to 64. But the expert committee which recommended routine testing said it was unclear at what age women were likely to benefit most from screening.

Researchers say the current breast screening programme in North West England reduces deaths from cancer by 12.8%, preventing 4,079 deaths over a period of 27 years.

Cancer experts estimate around one in 12 women in the UK will develop cancer at some point in their lives.

Using a computer simulation programme and 1987 data on women in the region, the researchers have shown that extending testing to women aged between 65 and 69 could cut deaths from cancer by 16.4% - at a cost of �2,990 per year of life saved.


[ image: Is it better to save more old people or save fewer younger people for longer?]
Is it better to save more old people or save fewer younger people for longer?
The research, published in this week's British Medical Journal, also shows that reducing the gap between testing from three to two years reduces deaths by 15.3%, costing �3,545 per year of life saved.

The total cost of the current screening programme is �30.9m. Increasing the number of tests would cost �40.6m and extending the age range for tests would cost �39.6m.

Most of the money would be eaten up by follow-up tests on women with suspicious symptoms, but some cash would be saved by catching cancers earlier.

Cost effective

The researchers say that extending the age range prevents more deaths, but reducing the gap between screenings allows people to live longer.

They believe the difference between the two options is "so small that either could be chosen".

And they say it is up to the NHS to choose whether it believes either course of action would be cost effective.

"It depends on the value the NHS is willing to place on improvements in the effectiveness of programmes," say the researchers, who are led by Dr Rob Boer of Erasmus University, Rotterdam.

Self-referral

In the same edition of the British Medical Journal, an East Sussex pilot study shows that the majority of women over 65 do not go for tests, even though screening saves lives and the women are entitled to refer themselves.

The study says many appear to be unaware they can refer themselves or assume they would be invited to attend if they were at risk.

In the pilot study, women over 65 are being invited to attend mobile screening units along with younger women.

Only 7% of women over 65 had self-referred previously and the majority of women aged 68 and 69 had not been screened for over five years - even though they were more likely to develop breast cancer than younger women.

Competition

The final results of the pilot will not be ready until the year 2000, but the researchers, led by Dr Linda Garvican of the South East Institute for Public Health, say preliminary results show "the potential for a high uptake rate and a high cancer detection rate in older women routinely invited for breast screening".

They are aware of the competition from other suggestions for improving the screening process, such as reducing the gap between screenings, and say any changes in the upper age range for routine tests will have to "compete for resources".

News image


Advanced options | Search tips


News image
News image
News imageBack to top | BBC News Home | BBC Homepage |
News image

News imageNews imageNews image
Health Contents
News image
News imageBackground Briefings
News imageMedical notes
News imageRelevant Stories
News image
30 Jul 98�|�Health
Electrical test for breast cancer
News image
10 Jul 98�|�Health
Doubt cast on breast cancer wonder drug
News image
03 Jul 98�|�Health
Cash shortage threat to breast screening
News image
17 Jun 98�|�Health
Government to act on breast cancer
News image

News image
News image
News image
News imageInternet Links
News image
Cancer Research Campaign factsheet
News image
UK Breast Cancer Awareness Campaign
News image
News imageNews image
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

News image
News image
News image
News imageIn this section
News image
Disability in depth
News image
Spotlight: Bristol inquiry
News image
Antibiotics: A fading wonder
News image
Mental health: An overview
News image
Alternative medicine: A growth industry
News image
The meningitis files
News image
Long-term care: A special report
News image
Aids up close
News image
From cradle to grave
News image
NHS reforms: A guide
News image
NHS Performance 1999
News image
From Special Report
NHS in crisis: Special report
News image
British Medical Association conference '99
News image
Royal College of Nursing conference '99
News image

News image
News image
News image