| You are in: World: Europe | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Thursday, 26 October, 2000, 14:47 GMT 15:47 UK Kursk note provides new clues ![]() The note gives insight into the Kursk's last moments By Russian affairs analyst Stephen Dalziel The discovery of a note in the pocket of the recovered body of a crew-member could provide the best clue yet as to what happened to the wrecked Kursk nuclear submarine The last words of Lieutenant-Captain Dmitry Kolesnikov seem to confirm that an explosion tore through the submarine shortly before 1300 on the 12 August.
There were 23 men. After a part of the note which is illegible, it ends with the words, "I'm writing this blindly". The note does seem to confirm that most of the 118 crew died instantly. But it will once again raise questions as to why nothing was done immediately to try to establish contact with those who made it into the ninth compartment. No contact After issuing initial reports that it was in contact with the crew, the navy admitted that, in fact, no contact was made.
What may never be known is for how long the 23 survived in the ninth compartment, or how they eventually died. On the basis of the note, the recovery mission's co-ordinator Admiral Vladimir Kuroyedov has ordered the divers to abandon the eighth compartment and concentrate their efforts on the ninth. Disaster theories That appears to be an acceptance of the idea that all those who were forward of the sixth compartment would have been caught up in the two explosions which ripped through the submarine, and their bodies would have been vaporised as a result.
Admiral Kuroyedov and the naval command have continued to expound the theory that the Kursk was in collision with another vessel, probably a foreign submarine. It is known that US and British submarines were in the Barents Sea, observing the Russian naval exercise that the Kursk was taking part in. Requests by the Russian Ministry of Defence to inspect these submarines were refused by Washington and London, something which the Russians have tried to portray as evidence of guilt. Collision 'inconcievable' But the collision theory seems weak when other factors are considered.
It seems inconceivable that any single-hulled vessel could collide with such a submarine and sail away, while the larger, stronger one sank to the bottom. Admiral Kuroyedov tried to strengthen his argument, when film shot this week by remote cameras of the outer hull of the Kursk showed dents. But these could well have been made when the submarine hit the sea bed, after falling through the water like a stone for nearly 100 metres. |
See also: Internet links: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top Europe stories now: Links to more Europe stories are at the foot of the page. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more Europe stories |
| ^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII|News Sources|Privacy | ||