| You are in: Business | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wednesday, 18 December, 2002, 12:14 GMT Pension green paper 'disappointing' ![]() Some employers may now offer schemes where there currently are none
We are relieved that the long-awaited green paper includes proposals to simplify the horrendously complex tax and regulatory regimes for workplace pension provision. The government has clearly listened to research carried out by many in the pensions community, including the NAPF, and we welcome this approach. We are disappointed, though not surprised, that the green paper has fought shy of simplifying the state pension system. The complex layers of state retirement provision include the basic state pension, minimum income guarantee, pension credit and the state second pension. These make it very difficult for many people, especially the less well off, to decide if and how to save for themselves. Stating the simple It is this complexity which undermines consumer confidence in pensions.
The government could have taken this opportunity to simplify state pension provision, allowing consumers to make their own top-up arrangements, either through their workplace, or with a private pension provider. The green paper is, however, a positive contribution, picking up on much of what Alan Pickering and Ron Sandler proposed five months ago. The NAPF welcomes government proposals to:
However, with pensions hitting the headlines almost every day, it seems to have taken a very long time for the Pickering and Sandler Reports to have become Government proposals. There is now a pressing need for the Department for Work and Pensions to push ahead with reform. Welcome review The Inland Revenue tax review, launched at the same time as the green paper, makes a number of radical and welcome proposals which will make it easier for firms to retain their pension schemes. The review offers the genuine prospect of some employers being able to offer schemes where there currently are none. Proposals to reduce from eight to one the number of tax systems facing occupational pension schemes are particularly welcome. Having listened, the onus is now on the government to act. The outstanding question mark hangs over the timing of these changes. The tax proposals involve a four month consultation process - which means no change for at least another 16 months. For many pension schemes and their members, this could be like getting your Christmas presents on Boxing Day. |
See also: 17 Dec 02 | Business 16 Dec 02 | Forum 17 Dec 02 | Business Internet links: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top Business stories now: Links to more Business stories are at the foot of the page. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more Business stories |
![]() | ||
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> | To BBC World Service>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |