| You are in: Business | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Friday, 5 April, 2002, 11:59 GMT 12:59 UK Fears remain over low cost pension ![]() Alistair Darling launches the scheme on 6 April 2001
The stakeholder pension scheme celebrated its first birthday on Saturday. The scheme was designed to offer a low-cost and transparent way of saving - and has been, in that sense, partly successful.
The scheme has also had an impact on the rest of the pension industry - higher standards are expected and charges have been eroded as a result of their launch. But a champagne-fuelled celebration this Saturday by the government was unlikely - it would be too premature. While news of multi-million pound investments into stakeholder plans is a positive sign for the government, such sums represent a mere blip when compared with the UK's estimated �27bn savings gap. Stakeholder benefits Stakeholder pension plans are good news for a beleaguered financial services industry and promise cheap charges and transparency for investors. The main features are:
Tax dodge? Stories that wealthy grandparents and parents have been using the scheme as a tax dodge for future generations of their families appear unfounded. Only 2% of plans were bought for children, and 1% by those aged 65 or older between April 2001 and February 2002. There was a hint of delight in the statement released by the Department for Work and Pensions this week. Alistair Darling, secretary of state for work and pensions, said: "Yet more encouraging results that tend to give the lie to all those stakeholder pensions bought by grandparents for their grandchildren. "Early results show steady sales going to people for whom they are intended." Growing awareness There is evidence - from another survey published this week - that the public's awareness of stakeholder plans has grown. A survey by Marks & Spencer Financial Services found that only 49% of people were unaware of the scheme, compared with 70% a year ago. But if this growing awareness fails to materialise in sales, the government could, in a move many in the trade see as increasingly likely, make private pension contributions compulsory. As Jeff Rooker, then a social security minister, confirmed to a social security select committee in July 2000 - before pensions became the political hot potato they are today - in 50 years the state pension is predicted to amount to just �31 a week in today's terms. "It will form an ever-diminishing contribution proportionate to the total pensioners income," Mr Rooker said. "Looked at on its own, if you like, it can be done as an academic exercise, but that is not the real world. Nobody is expected to live on it." In that sense, the debate about the stakeholder pension is so much wider than people saving for their retirements. The issue is at the heart of public services, the welfare state and the creation of National Insurance Contribution (Nics) in 1948. Other critics are concerned that compulsion could cause yet more complications for the UK pension industry - and the consumers who are desperately trying to understand what on earth it is all about. | Pensions crisisYou asked financial expert Tom McPhail
Internet links: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top Business stories now: Links to more Business stories are at the foot of the page. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more Business stories |
| ^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII|News Sources|Privacy | ||