![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wednesday, July 21, 1999 Published at 13:15 GMT 14:15 UK World: Asia-Pacific Would China dare to attack Taiwan? ![]() Wargames: 1996 operations believed to have exposed weaknesses By Charles Heyman Despite some alarmist reports to the contrary, most defence analysts do not believe that China is about to invade Taiwan. The facts behind all of the latest sabre-rattling is that the Chinese armed forces with over two million personnel are in no condition to undertake what would be one of the largest amphibious assaults in history.
At the moment, they have just over 70 landing vessels and to provide the force necessary for landings at several points in Taiwan would almost certainly require several hundred. Secondly, it is very doubtful that the Chinese could mass the number of modern sophisticated aircraft required to provide the local air superiority necessary over the Taiwan Strait during the operation. In addition, before embarking on such a risky military operation the Chinese forces do not appear to have been conducting the whole series of combined land, air and naval exercises that such an undertaking would require. Wargames Analysts believe that China's exercises in the Taiwan Strait in November 1996 were conducted as an effort to assess the ability of its armed forces to invade Taiwan.
"We do not believe the Chinese have the logistics capability to support the operations of a large complement of forward-deployed forces conducting high-intensity warfare," the ONI report stated. For the majority of military analysts there does not appear to have been any evidence to suggest that the situation has changed much during the past two-and-a-half years. The Chinese land forces remain essentially a 1970s organisation with too many men, very little really modern equipment and a continuing lack of an ability to mount effective combined operations. Fightback There is also little doubt that Taiwan would fight if attacked.
The air force has over 500 combat aircraft and some of these are very sophisticated, modern US F-16s and French Mirage 2000-5s. The strength of Taiwan's air defences is such that analysts believe that any attempt by China to launch a bombing campaign would be ineffective, either stopped before the aircraft had crossed the straits or met with fierce resistance over land. The 68,000 strong navy has more than 36 frigates and destroyers plus four submarines and would almost certainly be extremely effective against a Chinese naval force operating in Taiwanese waters. The US factor Finally, the real deterrent is the US Seventh Fleet with its headquarters at Yokosuka in Japan and a "Carrier Battle Group" capable of deploying quickly to a Taiwanese operational area.
More critically still, the presence of the US would almost certainly rule out an escalation of military action beyond conventional warfare. If China launched a missile attack on Taiwan, not only would it prompt a missile exchange - but would probably lead to the US being dragged into the conflict - the last thing Beijing wants to do. It is possible that Beijing might try to impose a sea and air blockade to destroy Taiwan's economy but this is unlikely given the probable inability of the Chinese navy to produce the number of ships and aircraft necessary to mount a co-ordinated blockade. The costs But, most importantly, the Chinese Government is well aware of the costs of such a military adventure.
There would be international outrage, a probably collapse of confidence in the economy and the possible loss of face in a messy military action against a well-armed Taiwanese military - all of which could destabilise an already worried Beijing. Almost all of military analysts say that, for now, an invasion of Taiwan is not on the cards. However, the political and military pressure will almost certainly continue and the situation could be very different in 10 to 15 years time. If China were to produce some really modern armed forces capable of carrying out joint operations in line with modern military concepts, analysts of the future could well be writing a different story. Charles Heyman is the editor of Jane's World Armies |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||