| You are in: World: Americas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
| Wednesday, 2 May, 2001, 00:34 GMT 01:34 UK Mixed reaction to 'Son of Star Wars' ![]() Britain is a strategic partner in the plan President George W Bush's determination to press ahead with the "Son of Star Wars" missile defence programme has met with measured encouragement from some of Washington's allies and predictable criticism from dissenters at home and abroad. Britain, which along with Denmark will be a base for some of the early-warning systems, welcomed the plan. Foreign Secretary Robin Cook said Britain shared the US's concern about the danger posed by "rogue states", and praised Mr Bush's proposals for wide-ranging consultations. "The important issue is the clear commitment we have seen today to work together with allies and with Russia," Mr Cook said. "We will work closely with the Bush administration as we always do - as close allies, with common strategic interests." But that view is far from universal in Britain. Phyllis Starkey, a Labour member of the foreign affairs select committee, called the proposals "profoundly destabilising". She voiced fears of another arms race, saying the danger was not just the effect on Russia, but on China "which sees itself as the real target of a missile defence". Consultation Observers note that, following harsh criticism for not consulting partners before dropping out of the Kyoto climate change treaty, Mr Bush is making a big show of consulting Nato allies and international partners, notably Russia, on his missile plans.
He has already outlined his plans to the leaders of Britain, Canada, France and Germany and on Tuesday called the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, to reassure him ahead of the speech. But despite the phone call, Moscow remains apprehensive. "Many in Washington understand that the destruction of ABM and deploying an anti-missile shield could undermine the system of strategic stability which exists in the world today and lead to a new arms race," the Russian news agency Interval quoted an unnamed "military-diplomatic" source as saying. Sweden also urged caution. "We urge President Bush to abstain from the National Missile Defense, just as we urge China, India and Pakistan to discontinue their nuclear arsenals," said Foreign Minister Anna Lindh.
US Democrat Neil Abercrombie, a member of the armed services research and development committee warned that talk of a possible missile defence had spawned "a burgeoning military and corporate apparatus dependent in large measure on missile defense to rationalize its existence." "Congress must guard against allowing missile defense systems becoming the policy, allowing the technology, in effect, to develop its own psychology."
Senate minority leader Tom Daschle called the plan "one of the biggest turkeys I've seen... there has not been one shred of evidence that it works," he said, insisting he would demand details on costs and feasibility. David Wright of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology agreed: "The bottom line is that the technology for the system is not ready," he warned. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld admitted that the missile defences deployed by the United States were unlikely to be perfect, but would be enough to act as an effective deterrent. He said: "They need not be 100% perfect in my opinion, and they are certainly unlikely to be in their early stages of evolution." |
See also: Internet links: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top Americas stories now: Links to more Americas stories are at the foot of the page. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more Americas stories |
| ^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII|News Sources|Privacy | ||